Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41193908›Full record

ReviewEuropean radiology2026

ESUR: Opportunities for PSMA-PET/CT and whole-body MRI in advanced prostate cancer.

Sungmin Woo, Luca Russo, Samuel J Withey, Ailin Dehghanpour, Roberto García-Figueiras, Ivo G Schoots, Giuseppe Petralia, Amish Lakhani, Tobias Penzkofer, Martina Pecoraro and 10 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Sungmin WooDepartment of Radiology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.
Luca RussoDipartimento Diagnostica per Immagini e Radioterapia Oncologica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Samuel J WitheyDepartment of Radiology, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Ailin DehghanpourDepartment of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Roberto García-FigueirasDepartment of Radiology, Oncologic Imaging, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Ivo G SchootsDepartment of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Giuseppe PetraliaDivision of Radiology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Amish LakhaniDepartment of Radiology, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Paul Strickland Scanner Centre, Northwood, UK.
Tobias PenzkoferDepartment of Radiology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Martina PecoraroDepartment of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Chen-Jiang WuDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Jochen WalzDepartment of Urology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes Cancer Centre, Marseille, France.
Matthias EiberDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Wolfgang P FendlerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Silke GillessenOncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Bellinzona, Switzerland.
Raquel Perez-LopezRadiomics Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain.
Frédéric E LecouvetDepartment of Medical Imaging, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Institut du Cancer Roi Albert II, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Tara D BarwickDepartment of Radiology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Health Care NHS Trust, London, UK.
Anwar R PadhaniDepartment of Radiology, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Paul Strickland Scanner Centre, Northwood, UK. anwar.padhani@stricklandscanner.org.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5830-5777
ESUR Prostate MRI Working Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) computed tomography (CT), and whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) are superior to conventional CT and bone scan imaging for detecting metastatic disease in patients with prostate cancer. While these higher-accuracy imaging methods have already shown the potential to enhance patient outcomes, a thorough understanding of the relationship between the treatment landscape and disease volume on conventional imaging, as well as the prognostic significance of the prostate-specific antigen response, is crucial for determining how they can be more effectively incorporated. Prospective clinical trials are required to evaluate whether PSMA-PET/CT and WB-MRI can genuinely improve clinically relevant endpoints for patients through precise treatment adaptations. In this paper, we explore the specific opportunities of PSMA-PET/CT and WB-MRI as biomarkers in multiple clinical domains, including metastasis detection and staging, disease characterisation and aggressiveness assessments, biopsy target selection, impacts on treatment planning, evaluation of therapeutic response, and theranostics. We highlight the central research questions that require attention. KEY POINTS: Question Can PSMA-PET/CT and WB-MRI, with their superior ability to detect metastases in prostate cancer, truly improve patient outcomes? Findings High-accuracy imaging improves metastasis detection, staging, assessment of disease aggressiveness, and enables more personalised treatment planning for advanced prostate cancer patients. Clinical relevance PSMA-PET/CT and WB-MRI have the potential to alter the management of men with advanced prostate cancer, but prospective clinical trials are needed to confirm benefits for survival or quality of life before recommending routine use.

Indexed as

Glutamate Carboxypeptidase IIMagnetic Resonance ImagingPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyProstatic NeoplasmsWhole Body ImagingAntigens, SurfaceHumansMaleNeoplasm StagingAntigens, SurfaceFOLH1 protein, humanGlutamate Carboxypeptidase IIAdvanced prostate cancerMetastasisProstate specific membrane antigen positron emission tomographyWhole-body magnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

PMID41193908
PMCPMC13035653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.