ReviewEuropean radiology2026
ESUR: Opportunities for PSMA-PET/CT and whole-body MRI in advanced prostate cancer.
Review in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative assessment of METastasis Reporting and Data System for Prostate Cancer versus Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 3 Criteria in assessing treatment response in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.European urology open science · 2026Article
- Integrating MRI-based tumour staging within the TNM classification system in modern prostate cancer management.Insights into imaging · 2026Review
- Prostate MRI in the United Kingdom: a survey of current practice by the British Society of Urogenital Radiology.The British journal of radiology · 2026Article
- Association Between Cribriform Architecture and Lymphovascular Invasion in Prostate Cancer.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Transrectal ultrasonographic parameters combined with total serum exosomes for the assessment of bone metastases in prostate cancer.Open life sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) computed tomography (CT), and whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) are superior to conventional CT and bone scan imaging for detecting metastatic disease in patients with prostate cancer. While these higher-accuracy imaging methods have already shown the potential to enhance patient outcomes, a thorough understanding of the relationship between the treatment landscape and disease volume on conventional imaging, as well as the prognostic significance of the prostate-specific antigen response, is crucial for determining how they can be more effectively incorporated. Prospective clinical trials are required to evaluate whether PSMA-PET/CT and WB-MRI can genuinely improve clinically relevant endpoints for patients through precise treatment adaptations. In this paper, we explore the specific opportunities of PSMA-PET/CT and WB-MRI as biomarkers in multiple clinical domains, including metastasis detection and staging, disease characterisation and aggressiveness assessments, biopsy target selection, impacts on treatment planning, evaluation of therapeutic response, and theranostics. We highlight the central research questions that require attention. KEY POINTS: Question Can PSMA-PET/CT and WB-MRI, with their superior ability to detect metastases in prostate cancer, truly improve patient outcomes? Findings High-accuracy imaging improves metastasis detection, staging, assessment of disease aggressiveness, and enables more personalised treatment planning for advanced prostate cancer patients. Clinical relevance PSMA-PET/CT and WB-MRI have the potential to alter the management of men with advanced prostate cancer, but prospective clinical trials are needed to confirm benefits for survival or quality of life before recommending routine use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.