ArticleScientific reports2025
Attitudes and behavioral outcomes of Nebraska hunters toward tick-borne disease.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
New threats to public and animal health are emerging as changes in climate, land use, and vegetation alter the landscape of the Great Plains. The annual incidence of tick-borne disease in Nebraska is increasing, and newly established species such as blacklegged ticks (Ixodes scapularis) and their associated pathogens may present challenges for health practitioners. One Health strategies for tick-borne disease prevention must incorporate effective messaging acknowledging variation in risk perception. We surveyed hunters in Nebraska to determine how the perception of risk for tick-borne disease influenced human behavior, using the Risk Perception Attitude Framework (RPAF) to assess differences in the level of intention to perform preventive behaviors against tick-borne disease among the 283 survey responses we received. We found higher behavioral intent among individuals in the RPAF group with highest perceived risk and self-efficacy. Individuals who found a tick on their body in the past had greater perceived risk toward tick-borne disease (mean risk perception score: 3.26, SD = 0.60) than those who had not (mean: 2.85, SD = 0.63; t = 3.37, df = 282, p < 0.01). Our study suggests that the increased risk of exposure to ticks as species ranges shift will primarily be perceived by local populations when they start to experience ticks. Our results provide valuable information to public health officials on tailoring One Health messaging for more effective prevention of tick-borne disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.