Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41193896›Full record

ReviewAesthetic plastic surgery2026

From Incision to Healing: An Evidence-Based Review of Scar Optimization in Upper Blepharoplasty.

Ali Aghajani, Leila Babaei, Bahram Eshraghi

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ali AghajaniDepartment of Ophthalmology, Isfahan eye research center, Isfahan University of medical sciences, Isfahan, Iran. aliaghajani_y@yahoo.com.ORCID 0000-0002-7790-6033
Leila BabaeiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Isfahan eye research center, Isfahan University of medical sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Bahram EshraghiDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Texas Health at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Upper blepharoplasty is one of the most commonly performed aesthetic procedures, with scar quality being a critical determinant of patient satisfaction. This review evaluates various surgical and postoperative strategies to optimize cosmetic outcomes and minimize complications such as wound dehiscence, milia formation, and scarring. Various incision modalities (including cold scalpel, radiofrequency (RF), and CO

Indexed as

BlepharoplastyCicatrixWound HealingEstheticsEvidence-Based MedicineEyelidsFemaleHumansMalePatient SatisfactionSuture TechniquesTreatment OutcomeBlepharoplastyBlepharoplasty scarScar prevention

Identifiers

PMID41193896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.