ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2026
Evaluating Rectus Abdominis Fascia and Alloderm as Wrapping Materials in Diced Cartilage Grafts for Dorsal Nasal Augmentation.
Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDorsal nasal augmentation can be performed using autologous diced costal cartilage wrapped in various materials. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of two different wrapping materials-rectus abdominis fascia and Alloderm-on postoperative aesthetics, functionality, and donor-site morbidity.
methodsThis is a retrospective study that included patients who underwent dorsal nasal augmentation. Patients were grouped into two cohorts: the rectus abdominis fascia group and the Alloderm group. Data collected included demographic information, surgical parameters, and postoperative outcomes. Anthropometric analyses of pre- and postoperative nasal dimensions were performed using lateral and frontal profile photographs. Additionally, subjective satisfaction was assessed using the rhinoplasty outcomes evaluation (ROE) questionnaire and visual analog scale (VAS), while objective outcomes were rated by blinded surgeons.
resultsBoth groups demonstrated significant improvements in nasal projection and contour, with similar anthropometric changes. The Alloderm group showed better scar outcomes and fewer complications, such as palpable graft particles. Postoperative recovery time at the chest donor site was significantly longer in the fascia group, with increased incision length and drainage compared to the Alloderm group. Both groups achieved substantial aesthetic and functional improvements, but the Alloderm group exhibited higher patient satisfaction and better surgeon-rated aesthetic outcomes at both short- and long-term follow-up.
conclusionsBoth rectus abdominis fascia and Alloderm are effective in achieving aesthetic improvements in dorsal nasal augmentation, with Alloderm showing advantages in terms of donor-site morbidity. The Alloderm technique may be preferable for minimizing complications and enhancing long-term aesthetic outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
41193895What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.