ArticleCommunity mental health journal2026
Barriers and Facilitators in the Implementation of Measurement-Based Care in Outpatient Behavioral Health in a Safety-Net Hospital.
Article in Community mental health journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Whose Truth Is Ground Truth?: Consequences of Label Choice on Machine Learning Models Predicting Depression.Research square · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Measurement-based care (MBC) is an evidence-based practice that can improve the identification of co-occurring mental health conditions and substance use disorders, as well as population differences in care in lower resource settings, through ongoing monitoring of patient-reported symptoms. The current study examined, as reported by different stakeholders prior to implementation, barriers and facilitators of implementing screening tools to monitor mental health and substance use symptoms in the outpatient behavioral health setting at a safety-net hospital. A purposeful sampling approach was used to recruit stakeholders from two outpatient clinics (child, adult) to participate in individual interviews (clinic leadership) and stakeholder-specific focus groups (clinicians and administrative staff). De-identified transcripts were coded using a directed content analytic approach guided by constructs from the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). A total of 14 clinicians, 6 clinic leaders, and 4 administrative staff participated in interviews and focus groups. Results indicate stakeholder agreement on specific implementation constructs (e.g., patient needs, networks and communication) and unique perspectives influenced by the stakeholders' day-to-day responsibilities. However, there were inconsistent responses regarding networks and communication across stakeholder groups. Clinicians only identified barriers, clinic leadership only identified facilitators, and administrative staff did not identify communication as a barrier or facilitator. Thus, when implementing MBC within a safety-net behavioral health clinic setting, cohesive communication may be perceived differently by clinicians, clinic leadership, and administrative staff and should be validated across staff roles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41193892What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.