ArticleJournal of hematopathology2025
Validation and interpretation of the Triple A model in Turkish myeloproliferative neoplasm patients with a focus on overall and thrombosis free survival.
Article in Journal of hematopathology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Triple A model has recently been developed and validated in essential thrombocythemia (ET) and polycythemia vera (PV). However, external validation in diverse populations remains unclear. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to externally validate the Triple A prognostic model in a Turkish cohort of patients with ET and PV.
methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted at two centers in Bursa, Türkiye, involving patients diagnosed with ET or PV under the World Health Organization (WHO) 2016/2022 criteria between 2014 and 2024.
resultsWhile the Triple A model has significantly separated the ET patients with a median follow-up of 47 months (p = 0.015), no significant difference was observed in PV patients in terms of survival (p = 0.87). For thrombosis-free survival (TFS), Fine and Gray's competing risk analysis showed a significant separation with the Triple A model in ET (p = 0.017).
conclusionWhile the Triple A model was validated as a practical prognostic tool in ET, it demonstrated limited utility in PV. Further multicenter studies are needed to refine risk stratification in PV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41193887What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.