ArticleBritish journal of cancer2026
Use of non-prescription analgesic medications and survival among Black women with ovarian cancer.
Article in British journal of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundChronic inflammation and inflammatory-related exposures have been implicated in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) prognosis. However, no studies have evaluated whether analgesic medication use impacts survival in Black women with EOC, an understudied population with poor survival.
methodsLeveraging data from the African American Cancer Epidemiology Study, we examined the association of pre-diagnostic analgesic medication use (aspirin, non-aspirin non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs [naNSAIDs], and acetaminophen) with survival among self-identified Black women diagnosed with EOC (N = 541) using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression. Stratified analyses were conducted by comorbidities and histotype.
resultsAcetaminophen use was associated with a higher risk of mortality overall (HR = 1.40; 95% CI = 1.00-1.97) and for frequent and chronic use (≥30 days per month: HR = 1.62; 95% CI = 1.12-2.34; >5 years: HR = 1.57; 95% CI = 1.03-2.39). These associations were more pronounced among women with high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC)/carcinosarcoma and those with comorbidities. Among women with comorbidities, naNSAID use was associated with a decreased risk of mortality (HR = 0.71; 95% CI = 0.51-0.99), but no association was observed among women without comorbidities (HR = 0.99; 95% CI = 0.56-1.75). No associations with survival were observed for aspirin.
conclusionChronic use of acetaminophen negatively impacted survival among Black women with EOC, while naNSAID use conferred a survival advantage only among women with comorbidities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.