ArticleProtoplasma2026
Decoding the genetic basis of Cnaphalocrocis medinalis (Guenee) resistance in rice landraces using SSR markers and association mapping.
Article in Protoplasma, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The rice leaffolder, Cnaphalocrocis medinalis, is a major pest threatening rice production, causing significant yield losses. Developing resistant cultivars offers a sustainable and eco-friendly approach to its management. This study aimed to identify leaffolder-resistant rice genotypes and explore associated genomic regions using SSR markers for future marker-assisted breeding. A total of 96 rice landraces were evaluated under both net house and field conditions across two cropping seasons. Based on consistent phenotypic performance, 20 genotypes were classified as resistant, 28 as moderately resistant, and 28 as susceptible. Genetic screening using reported SSR markers for leaffolder resistance revealed high polymorphism, with an average PIC of 0.75 and gene diversity ranging from 0.612 to 0.834. Cluster and structure analysis grouped the genotypes into three major clusters, with most resistant genotypes forming a distinct group. PCA further validated this genetic grouping, effectively separating resistant, moderately resistant, and susceptible genotypes. Additionally, heat map of kinship matrix supported the population differentiation. AMOVA indicated that 86% of total genetic variation was attributed to differences within populations, while 14% was observed among populations. Association analysis using simple linear regression identified three markers viz: RM72, RM48, and RM162, on chromosomes 8, 2 and 6, respectively, linked to leaffolder resistance. Notably, these markers are located near genes, that are involved in rice defense responses against leaffolder as well as other biotic stresses. Overall, the integration of phenotypic and molecular data in this study provides a foundation for marker-assisted selection and provides valuable genomic resources for developing durable leaffolder-resistant rice cultivars.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41193838What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.