SynthesisClinical oral investigations2025
Efficacy of different therapeutic options for pain relief and treatment of burning mouth syndrome: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Clinical oral investigations, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Burning Mouth Syndrome, the Oral Microbiome, and Lactic Acid Bacteria: A Comprehensive Review of Clinical Features, Microbial Dysbiosis, and Probiotic Therapeutic Potential.Microorganisms · 2026Review
- Exploring the potential factors of burning mouth syndrome in elderly people: A cross-sectional study.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2026Review
- Topical and Mucoadhesive Administration of Capsaicin in the Burning Mouth Syndrome Treatment.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of different therapeutic options currently used to treat and relieve the pain of Burning Mouth Syndrome (BMS), in order to provide better clinical guidance for future practice. MATERIALS AND
methodsA systematic qualitative synthesis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted, grouping evidence by intervention type. Twenty-one RCTs were included, assessing pharmacological, topical, systemic, physical, and combined interventions. Studies were selected if they directly evaluated treatments in patients diagnosed with BMS; non-randomized trials were excluded. Electronic searches were performed in PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scielo using the MeSH terms: "Burning Mouth Syndrome," "Oral Burning," "Treatment," and "Randomized Controlled Trial." Outcomes focused on symptom relief, adverse effects, and comparisons with placebo or other treatments. Methodological quality was assessed using risk of bias criteria. Data extraction followed a systematic, cross-validated protocol. Due to substantial clinical and methodological heterogeneity, only a qualitative synthesis was performed.
resultsFourteen interventions were identified, including alpha-lipoic acid, topical/systemic clonazepam, low-level laser therapy (LLLT), capsaicin, melatonin, gabapentin, and cognitive-behavioral therapy. Topical clonazepam, alpha-lipoic acid, and LLLT consistently demonstrated the most significant symptom improvement with few mild adverse effects.
conclusionsWhile topical clonazepam, alpha-lipoic acid, and low-level laser therapy (LLLT) emerged as potentially effective options in several RCTs, the overall strength of evidence is limited. These therapies appear promising, but further high-quality, larger randomized trials are needed before firm first-line recommendations can be made. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study provides evidence-based guidance for clinicians in selecting effective treatments for BMS, emphasizing tailored therapeutic approaches and the potential benefits of topical clonazepam, alpha-lipoic acid, and low-level laser therapy as first-line options.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41193828What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.