ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2026
Development of Entrustable Professional Activities for Complex General Surgical Oncology.
Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEntrustable professional activities (EPAs) are familiar to academic surgeons since their adoption by the American Board of Surgery in 2023. Complex general surgical oncology (CGSO) fellowships have been required to adopt EPAs as part of the goal of competency-based education. This report describes the results from the initial creation of an EPA set for CGSO.
methodsThree separate groups are involved in the creation of an EPA set. The first group is the oversight group or "owner" of the process. This group takes responsibility for defining the need and for final approval of the EPA set. In the reported case, the CGSO Board comprised this group. The second group defines the EPA set, defines the scope of each, and provides direct oversight of the writing process. A group of senior volunteers assumed this task. The third group performed the detailed writing and included the attending surgeons as well as the surgical residents and CGSO fellows.
resultsTo encompass the core of surgical oncology, 12 EPA topics were selected. To these EPAs were mapped 19 of 23 CGSO milestones to provide clinically applicable assessment tools for the majority of the milestones. DISCUSSION: Creation of an EPA set for CGSO entailed several challenges described in this report. The methods used by the authors are described in detail to serve as a potential template for other specialties. Because most individuals will have only one opportunity to develop similar programs, the authors present their experience with the hope that it will be useful to others as they embark on creation of EPAs for their own specialty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41193824What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.