Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41193820›Full record

ReviewAnnals of surgical oncology2026

Implementation of Quality Improvement Projects: A Practical Guide From the American Society of Breast Surgeons Patient Safety and Quality Committee.

Kandice K Ludwig, Amanda Kong, Sara Grossi, Kathie Ann Joseph, Solange Cox, Debra Pratt

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of surgical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kandice K LudwigIndiana University School of Medicine, Carmel, Indianapolis, IN, USA. kaludwig@iu.edu.
Amanda KongMedical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Sara GrossiUniversity of California San Diego Health, San Diego, CA, USA.
Kathie Ann JosephNYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.
Solange CoxMD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Debra PrattCleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHospital systems must document adherence to strict quality standards to achieve specialty accreditation. Requirements often include completion of quality improvement (QI) projects. Because breast surgeons are often the leaders of the multidisciplinary teams, they are tasked with initiating these QI projects. Although they are comfortable interpreting data in their practices, most breast surgeons lack formal training in quality. This report aims to provide guidance for breast surgeons to initiate and navigate QI projects.

methodsThe Patient Safety and Quality Committee of the American Society of Breast Surgeons reviewed the literature for relevant resources of surgical quality to establish a framework for surgeons to use when performing QI projects.

resultsReview of the literature and online sources showed nine key principles breast surgeons should use when performing QI studies. Emerging data, a change in process, or patient/provider feedback can provide potential ideas for study. After creating a problem statement, the stakeholder team defines the current state by obtaining local data and comparing it with established benchmarks. Once a gap is identified, a root cause analysis is performed to determine potential interventions for improvement. Assessment of results after implementation can be used to measure success.

conclusionQuality improvement in breast surgery involves a combined effort between health care staff and stakeholders to improve the care provided to patients. Breast surgeons are well positioned to direct these projects as leaders of the care teams. This report provides a framework for common understanding of the key principles of QI in breast surgery.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsPatient SafetyPractice Guidelines as TopicQuality ImprovementSurgeonsFemaleHumansSocieties, MedicalUnited StatesBreast surgeryCancer surgeryHealth care qualityQuality improvement

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.