ArticleScientific reports2025
Enhancing kelp productivity in restoration and assisted adaptation interventions under ocean warming.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evidence of a genomic basis for growth rate variation in a natural kelp population.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Proactive climate interventions, such as restoration and assisted adaptation, are increasingly being used to secure the persistence of populations under climate change. Such strategies are being proposed globally for declining kelp forests, yet there remains a lack of consideration for potential impacts to other key traits that underpin their immense values. Here we assess the outcome of restoration and assisted adaptation strategies on kelp productivity - a key component of kelp forest blue carbon, habitat provision and ecosystem service values. We combine empirical field data, climate projections and knowledge of underlying genomics to compare kelp productivity across restoration and assisted adaptation scenarios that are, and are not, informed by productivity-temperature relationships within source populations. Using Western Australian kelp (Ecklonia radiata) forests, we show that the productivity of restored kelp using traditional strategies for selecting source material may decline by 16-22% under mid-century ocean warming. However, drawing on knowledge of productivity-temperature relationships to strategically select individuals could enhance the productivity of restored kelp by up to 9% even under mid-century ocean warming, while simultaneously boosting thermal resilience. Optimising trait interactions when undertaking climate interventions will be key to sustaining values associated with restored kelp forests in a warming ocean.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.