Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41193719›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Microbiology2026

Current and projected effects of climate change in cryosphere microbial ecosystems.

Scott Sugden, Christina L Davis, Matthew W Quinn, Lyle G Whyte

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Twenty-two novel glacierISME communications · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Scott SugdenDepartment of Natural Resource Sciences, McGill University, Sainte-Anne-de-Bellevue, Québec, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6482-4733
Christina L DavisDepartment of Natural Resource Sciences, McGill University, Sainte-Anne-de-Bellevue, Québec, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9331-2200
Matthew W QuinnDepartment of Natural Resource Sciences, McGill University, Sainte-Anne-de-Bellevue, Québec, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-1349-1448
Lyle G WhyteDepartment of Natural Resource Sciences, McGill University, Sainte-Anne-de-Bellevue, Québec, Canada. lyle.whyte@mcgill.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3443-3299

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cold environments, including glaciers, ice sheets, permafrost soils and sea ice, are common across the surface of the Earth. Despite the challenges of life at subzero temperatures, the global cryosphere hosts diverse microbial communities that support biogeochemical cycling and ecosystem functioning in areas where few other organisms can survive. However, the composition and function of cryosphere microbial communities, and the continued existence of cryosphere habitats, are threatened by ongoing climate change, which has disproportionate impacts in polar regions. In this Review, we survey the breadth of cryosphere habitats and the composition, function and unique adaptations of the microbial communities that inhabit them. We outline how climate change can affect these communities and the ecosystem services they provide through short-term changes in substrate availability, enzyme activity and redox potentials as well as longer-term changes in community composition. We also explore the wide-ranging consequences these changes may have for local ecosystems, human communities and the global climate. Finally, we outline the knowledge gaps in cryosphere microbial ecology that contribute to uncertainties about the future of these ecosystems in a warming world.

Indexed as

Climate ChangeEcosystemIce CoverMicrobiotaBacteriaHumans

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.