ArticleScientific reports2025
Detection of commercial crop weeds using machine learning algorithms.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Herbicide Resistance Genes in Crops: Mechanisms, Progress, and Future Perspectives.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Secured framework for IoT based healthcare application.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Dynamic channel allocation for secondary users in cognitive radio network.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Smart IoT applications of multi attack detection using cluster F1MI approach.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This work investigates the YOLOv5 object detection algorithms for classifying commercial crops such as tomatoes, chili, and cotton. The data sets comprise 707 images of green chillies, 200 images of tomato crops and 130 images of weeds from Ponnandagoundanoor farms in western agro climatic Zones (WAZ) of Tamil Nadu. The objective of this research is to explore the determination of weed present in the crops and further the machine learning (ML) algorithms that have deployed for computing the F1 score, detection time, and mAP of each machine learning algorithms. As a result, a tomato dataset contains an F1 score of 98%, a mAP of 0.995, and a detection time of 190 ms; a cotton dataset with an F1 score of 91% and a mAP of 0.947; and a chilly dataset with an F1 score of 78% and a mAP of 0.811. A Further investigation has been carried out for the same crops; improving YOLOv5 accuracy includes adaptively spatial feature fusion (ASSF) blocks to its architecture head. An enhanced YOLOv5 algorithm using ASFF modules on the same datasets achieved an F1 score of 99.7% in the tomato dataset and 79.4% in the chilly dataset, resulting in a 1.14% improvement in the F1 score. With a 93.53% F1 score, were able to obtain a 2% enhancement over the cotton dataset. The extended YOLOv5 increased the mAP by about 0.5% and resulted in an insignificant drop in the number of computations carried out, rendering the model more compact.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.