Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41193699›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Evaluating eye-hand coordination with digital technologies.

Francesca Di Rocco, Marianna De Maio, Emanuel Festino, Olga Papale, Philip X Fuchs, Rubens A Da Silva, Alexis Barbeau, Cristina Cortis, Andrea Fusco

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Francesca Di RoccoDepartment of Human Sciences, Society and Health, University of Cassino and Lazio Meridionale, Via S. Angelo-Località Folcara, 03043, Cassino, FR, Italy.
Marianna De MaioDepartment of Human Sciences, Society and Health, University of Cassino and Lazio Meridionale, Via S. Angelo-Località Folcara, 03043, Cassino, FR, Italy.
Emanuel FestinoDepartment of Human Sciences, Society and Health, University of Cassino and Lazio Meridionale, Via S. Angelo-Località Folcara, 03043, Cassino, FR, Italy.
Olga PapaleDepartment of Human Sciences, Society and Health, University of Cassino and Lazio Meridionale, Via S. Angelo-Località Folcara, 03043, Cassino, FR, Italy.
Philip X FuchsDepartment of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, National Taiwan Normal University, 162, Section 1, Heping E. Rd., Taipei City, 106, Taiwan.
Rubens A Da SilvaDepartment of Health Sciences, Physical Therapy Program and Research Laboratory BioNR, Université du Québec à Chicoutimi, 555 Bd de l'Université, Chicoutimi, QC, G7H 2B1, Canada.
Alexis BarbeauDepartment of Human Sciences, Society and Health, University of Cassino and Lazio Meridionale, Via S. Angelo-Località Folcara, 03043, Cassino, FR, Italy.
Cristina CortisDepartment of Human Sciences, Society and Health, University of Cassino and Lazio Meridionale, Via S. Angelo-Località Folcara, 03043, Cassino, FR, Italy. c.cortis@unicas.it.
Andrea FuscoDepartment of Medicine and Aging Sciences, University of "G. D'Annunzio" Chieti-Pescara, 66100, Chieti, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Digital tools, such as computerized wobble boards (WB), offer a novel approach to assess dynamic balance in lower limbs. Since their potential for evaluating eye-hand coordination remains unexplored, this study assessed the inter-test reliability and concurrent validity of WB measurements for upper limb fine motor skills, proposing WB as an alternative to the Grooved Pegboard test (GPT). Fifty-three healthy participants completed WB and GPT tests, and a WB retest after 48 h. The custom WB software displayed real-time performance via a motion marker and target zone. Participants moved the marker within the target zone following predefined patterns (clockwise, counterclockwise, anteroposterior, mediolateral) across four 15-s trials per hand. Performance was quantified as the duration (s) the marker remained in the target zone under each condition. According to Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) WB demonstrated good to excellent reliability (ICC: 0.62-0.80), acceptable Standard Error of Measurement (SEM: 0.96-2.14 s), and minimal detectable change (MDC

Indexed as

Digital TechnologyHandMotor SkillsPsychomotor PerformanceAdultFemaleHumansMaleReproducibility of ResultsYoung AdultMotor skillsNeuromuscular performanceReliabilityUpper limb coordinationValidity

Identifiers

PMID41193699
PMCPMC12589415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.