ArticleMolecular systems biology2026
Identification of potent high-affinity secondary nucleation inhibitors of Aβ42 aggregation from an ultra-large chemical library using deep docking.
Article in Molecular systems biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Computer-aided drug discovery: historical foundations, practical AI tools, and emerging ethical considerations.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease is characterized by the aggregation of the Aβ peptide into amyloid fibrils. According to the amyloid hypothesis, pharmacologically targeting Aβ aggregation could result in disease-modifying treatments. The identification of inhibitors of Aβ aggregation, however, is complicated by complex technical challenges, which typically restrict to tens of thousands the number of compounds that can be screened in experimental aggregation assays. Here, we report a computational route to increase by 4 orders of magnitude the number of screenable compounds. We achieve this result by developing an open source pipeline version of the Deep Docking protocol, and illustrate its application to the discovery of secondary nucleation inhibitors of Aβ aggregation from an ultra-large chemical library of over 539 million compounds. The pipeline was used to prioritize 35 candidate compounds for in vitro testing in Aβ aggregation assays. We found that 19 of these compounds inhibit Aβ aggregation (54% hit rate). The two most potent compounds showed potency better than adapalene, a previously reported potent inhibitor of Aβ aggregation. Consistent with the intended mechanism of action, these two compounds also proved to be high-affinity binders of Aβ fibrils with an equilibrium dissociation constant in the low nanomolar range in surface plasmon resonance experiments. These results provide evidence that structure-based docking methods based on deep learning represent a cost-effective and rapid strategy to identify potent hits for drug development targeting protein misfolding diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.