Trial reportScientific reports2025
Short-term dentin-pulp complex repair with four pulp capping materials: a double-blind randomized crossover histological study.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the histological short-term response of intact premolars following direct pulp capping (DPC) using four bioactive materials: Neo MTA Plus (NMP), Neo Putty (NP), Total Fill BC Fast set putty (FSP), and Total Fill BC RRM Paste (BCP). Thirty-two intact premolars in eight patients scheduled for orthodontic extraction were included. Teeth were randomly assigned into four groups based on the bioactive material applied during pulpotomy. Each patient will experience the four direct pulp capping materials, randomly assigned to their four premolars: NMP group (n = 8), NP group (n = 8), FSP group (n = 8), and BCP group (n = 8). Premolars were extracted after four weeks. Histological evaluations assessed pulpal inflammation intensity (PII) and dentinal bridge continuity (DBC). Kruskal-Walis and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to analyze the data. Statistical significance was set at α = 0.05. There were significant differences in the PII among groups (p = 0.001). The NMP group was lower than the other three material groups (NP, FSP, and BCP). Moreover, there were significant differences in the DBC among groups (p < 0.001). DBC in the NMP group was lower than that of the other three material groups (NP, FSP, and BCP). Additionally, the DBC in the FSP group was higher than in the NP and BCP groups. The short-term histological examination suggests that the NMP group exhibited the lowest PII but was associated with inferior continuity of the formed dentin bridge. In contrast, the FSP group demonstrated superior continuity of the formed dentin bridge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.