ArticleScientific reports2025
ekofertile and microfertile plant biostimulants enhanced wheat productivity and water use efficiency.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The extensive reliance on synthetic agrochemicals in modern agriculture has raised environmental concerns, prompting the need for sustainable alternatives. ekofertile and microfertile biostimulants, consisting of nutrients, organic acids, and beneficial microbes, offer eco-friendly alternatives to synthetic fertilizers. However, their potential remained unexploited. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of these biostimulants on wheat productivity and water use efficiency (WUE) under controlled greenhouse conditions. A split-plot experimental design was employed, incorporating two biostimulants (ekofertile and microfertile) and five treatment levels (control, inorganic fertilization, 2.5%, 5% and 10% biostimulant dosages), triplicated in the greenhouse. Results showed that ekofertile had a significantly higher tillering total chlorophyll content than microfertile. Treatment level 10% had the highest significant tillering and stem elongation total chlorophyll content (3.05 and 3.02 mg/g, respectively). microfertile x 10% stem elongation, total chlorophyll content was the highest significant (3.03 mg/g). ekofertile (9.4 t ha⁻¹) yielded more than microfertile (8.8 t ha⁻¹) in grain yield, while the 10% treatment level yielded the highest (10.4 t ha⁻¹). Water use efficiency was higher under ekofertile (3,279 g mL⁻¹) compared to microfertile (2,928 g mL⁻¹), with the 10% treatment level achieving higher WUE (3553 g mL⁻¹). These findings highlight the potential of ekofertile and microfertile biostimulants in enhancing wheat productivity at appropriate treatment levels, making them viable alternatives to synthetic fertilizers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.