ArticleScientific reports2025
Deep reinforcement learning-based intrusion detection scheme for software-defined networking.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- An Explainable Federated Intrusion Detection Framework for SDN Using Distributed Key Generation and Threshold Homomorphic Encryption.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- D3O-IIoT: deep reinforcement learning-driven dynamic deception orchestration for industrial IoT security.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A robust Deep Reinforcement Learning-based Intrusion Detection Scheme (DRL-IDS) for Software-Defined Networking (SDN) which combines the Long-Short Term Sequence Recurrent Neural Network (LFTS-RNN) with the Particle Cloud-Integrated Joint Time- and Feature-Optimization Algorithm (PC-JTFOA). The hybrid model aims to enhance the security of SDN through the detection and mitigation of a wide array of Distributed Denial of Service attacks and network misbehaviors across different SDN planes. The LFTS-RNN is used for accurate attack detection and misbehavior identification. Meanwhile, the PC-JTFOA optimizes feature selection, load balancing, and energy-efficient routing, thus ensuring fast and reliable network traffic management. The deep reinforcement learning approach further enables continuous adaptation to changing network behaviors, thus making the model dynamically adapt to known as well as emerging attack vectors. The proposed DRL-IDS scheme obtains superior performance in experimental results based on the NSL-KDD and WPPD datasets. The LFTS-RNN model indicates a highly impressive sensitivity of 98.67% and specificity of 97.42%, while the DRL-IDS model presents an detection accuracy of 99.85%. The PC-JTFOA further improves the solution by exhibiting a low response time of 1423 ms, which indicates tremendous improvement in computational efficiency. A comparative analysis with the existent intrusion detection methods pointed out that the scheme proposed not only outperforms other models in terms of detection accuracy as well as adaptability, but it also reduces complexity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.