Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41193655›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

End-digit preference of readings of grip strength measured with analogue-display devices.

Karolina Piotrowicz, Joanna Czesak, Monika Ryś, Ian Perera, Barbara Gryglewska, Tomasz Grodzicki, Jerzy Gąsowski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Karolina PiotrowiczDepartment of Internal Medicine and Gerontology, Jagiellonian University Medical College and University Hospital, Kraków, Poland.
Joanna CzesakDepartment of Clinical Rehabilitation, University School of Physical Education, Kraków, Poland.
Monika RyśDepartment of Internal Medicine and Gerontology, Jagiellonian University Medical College and University Hospital, Kraków, Poland.
Ian PereraDepartment of Internal Medicine and Gerontology, Jagiellonian University Medical College and University Hospital, Kraków, Poland.
Barbara GryglewskaDepartment of Internal Medicine and Gerontology, Jagiellonian University Medical College and University Hospital, Kraków, Poland.
Tomasz GrodzickiDepartment of Internal Medicine and Gerontology, Jagiellonian University Medical College and University Hospital, Kraków, Poland.
Jerzy GąsowskiDepartment of Internal Medicine and Gerontology, Jagiellonian University Medical College and University Hospital, Kraków, Poland. jerzy.gasowski@uj.edu.pl.

Funding

Narodowe Centrum Badań i Rozwoju THCS/I/24/RENEW/2025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Grip strength is frequently measured with analogue dynamometers graded to the nearest 2 kg. The end digits of such measurements should be even numbers or zero with frequency of 20% each. The accuracy of the grip strength measurements was never assessed for the possible end digit preference. We aimed to assess the end digit preference in the measurements of grip strength and the possible differences between examiners experienced and inexperienced in geriatrics. We did a retrospective analysis of grip strength data previously gathered. Data were recorded by two teams of examiners who performed grip strength measurements, using analogue devices, in older hospitalized patients. Team A consisted of geriatricians or physiotherapists working in the geriatric care setting. Team B consisted of physiotherapists without special experience in geriatrics who received a short, standardized instruction. We analysed a total of 251 (37.8% by team experienced in geriatrics) measurements. Grip strength was recorded with significant end digit preference leading to biased results. This was especially true of non-geriatric as opposed to geriatric trained examiners. Overall, values measured by Team A were 8.3 times more likely to end, correctly, on even digit or zero than end digits recorded by Team B (OR 8.3, 95%CI 2.9-25.0, p < 0.0001). We demonstrated a significant end digit preference, predominantly in examiners without experience in geriatrics. Standardized training and constant quality checks but also training in the importance of accuracy and the importance of muscular assessment in older patients are needed to ensure correct recording of grip strength values.

Indexed as

Hand StrengthMuscle Strength DynamometerAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleGeriatric AssessmentHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesDynamometerEnd digit preferenceGrip strengthMeasurement accuracyMeasurement methodology

Identifiers

PMID41193655
PMCPMC12589620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.