ArticleScientific reports2025
Optimization of energy consumption in the gas refinery sweetening unit using RSM, ANN, and Aspen HYSYS.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Oil Characterization, Molecular Modeling and Process Simulation in Petroleum Research and Industry, Opportunities, Challenges and Perspectives.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This research focuses on introducing the gas sweetening unit and identifying its optimal operating conditions using advanced modeling techniques. By analyzing experimental data collected over 1227 days from a gas refinery's sweetening unit, the study investigates factors influencing energy consumption. Two methods, response surface methodology (RSM) and artificial neural networks (ANNs), were employed to model the process, with the ANNs utilizing a multilayer perceptron (MLP) and a radial basis function (RBF). The R² value for RSM was 0.930, whereas the ANN models achieved higher accuracy, with R² values of 0.981 for RBF and 0.986 for MLP. Performance metrics also favored MLP, which recorded a lower error value of 0.002 compared to RBF (0.0051), making MLP the preferred method. Using the optimized MLP model, it was predicted that with an input feed of 8.3 MMSCM, 30.3% DEA amine, and 12.7% methyl diethanol amine (MDEA), fuel consumption could be reduced to 17380.2 SCM - a saving of 12710 SCM. Finally, the accuracy of the MLP model's predictions was validated through simulations in Aspen HYSYS, further confirming its effectiveness in optimizing energy consumption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.