ArticleScientific reports2025
Longitudinal assessment of renal allograft function in donors and pediatric recipients by arterial spin labeling MRI perfusion quantification.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Study on Predicting Split Renal Function Using Renal Blood Flow Weighted Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate From Arterial Spin Labeling MRI.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2026Article
- Multiparametric functional MRI for early detection of renal impairment: clinical applications and future directions.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We analyzed cortical renal blood flow (cRBF) by ASL-MRI in ten donors (4 females, mean age 46 ± 6) and dedicated pediatric recipients (4 females, mean age 14 ± 4) before transplantation and at 3-, 6-, and 12-months post-transplant to identify allograft functional adaptation. Baseline values were compared to post-transplant values and correlated with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Additionally, renal plasma flow (RPF) and estimated filtration fraction (eFF) were calculated. Both cRBF and eGFR demonstrated a highly significant increase at 3 months compared to baseline (mean cRBF 251.71 ± 78.27 vs. 486.61 ± 156.08 ml/kidney/min, p = 0.0001; mean eGFR 46.62 ± 16.36 vs. 69.81 ± 24.83 ml/min/1.73 m
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.