ArticleScientific reports2025
Multi criterion decision making analysis of hematologic cancer drugs via topological indices and physicochemical properties.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this research, quantitative structure property relationship (QSPR) regression along with multi criteria decision making (MCDM) approaches, including TOPSIS and Simple Additive Weighting (SAW), is deployed to rank the antihematological cancer drugs by structural and physicochemical attributes. Topological indices like zagreb, Randic and Atom Bond Connectivity (ABC) indices are calculated with the Maple program and chemspider was employed to obtain physicochemical descriptors such as boiling point; molar refraction; polarizability and molar volume which are both modeled using cubic and logarithm regression. The cubic model performed better than the logarithmic models, both in terms of correlation coefficients and predictive accuracy. In the present study, two compounds with more complexity of structure and greater connectivity, Carfilzomib and Zanubrutinib were ranked higher by QSPR and MCDM model considering the structural features compared to those with simpler molecular frameworks including Cyclophosphamide and Cytarabine which was placed lower. The above results suggest that compositing QSPR regression and MCDM is applicable towards computationally automatic, yet efficient process for screening drug candidates systematically at the beginning stages of hematologic cancer therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.