Trial reportScientific reports2025
Ultrafiltration-sodium profiles and their impact on thirst and xerostomia in hemodialysis patients.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Impact of Chronic Kidney Disease on Oral Health: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic kidney disease affects 10-15% of the global population, with hemodialysis causing significant thirst and xerostomia due to fluid restrictions. These symptoms impair quality of life and treatment adherence. While ultrafiltration (UF) and sodium profiling have been studied separately, their combined effect remains understudied, particularly in Middle Eastern populations. We conducted a randomized crossover trial with 20 ESRD patients comparing: (1) ascending/descending UF with linear sodium reduction (150→138 mmol/L) versus (2) conventional HD with constant UF/sodium (140 mmol/L). Participants completed 16 sessions per protocol with washout periods. Outcomes were measured using validated Thirst Questionnaire (5-item) and Xerostomia Inventory (11-item), both showing excellent reliability (Cronbach's α > 0.7/>0.8). The intervention group showed significant improvements versus conventional HD: 44% reduction in thirst scores (36.5 vs. 64.5, p < 0.001). 22% lower xerostomia (19.0 vs. 24.4, p = 0.002). 73% fewer hypotension episodes (15% vs. 55%, p < 0.05). These benefits are mechanistically linked to improved hemodynamic stability achieved through synergistic sodium and ultrafiltration profiling. This approach, which maintains plasma osmolality and intravascular volume, offers a practical, cost-neutral solution for symptom management. This approach significantly ameliorates patient-reported thirst and xerostomia and reduces intradialytic hypotension, offering a practical, cost-neutral strategy to enhance treatment tolerability. This approach should be adopted in routine practice, particularly for the growing ESRD population. Future studies should explore personalized strategies and long-term effects.Trial registration: This study was registered in the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (no. IRCT20180429039463N5) on 07/01/2023. https//irct.behdasht.gov.ir/trial/67,695.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.