Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41193603›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Care burden and outcomes in young carers during and after the COVID‑19 pandemic: psychological distress and cognitive-emotional aspects.

Ziyan Wang, Bing Niu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ziyan WangGraduate School of Economics, Osaka Metropolitan University, 3-3-138 Sugimoto Sumiyoshi-ku, Osaka-shi, 558-8585, Japan.
Bing NiuGraduate School of Economics, Osaka Metropolitan University, 3-3-138 Sugimoto Sumiyoshi-ku, Osaka-shi, 558-8585, Japan. niubing@omu.ac.jp.

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 20K13514
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Global social and policy concerns regarding young carers' care burden are increasing, but the outcomes of their caring responsibilities, especially in Asian countries, remain inadequately explored. We empirically examined the associations of care burden with psychological distress and cognitive-emotional aspects using cross‑sectional online surveys of young carers aged 15-19 living throughout Japan in 2021 (during the COVID‑19 pandemic) and 2024 (post‑pandemic). Each survey sampled a different group of young carers. The Kessler Psychological Distress Scale and Positive and Negative Outcomes of Caring were used to assess outcomes, which were analyzed in relation to care complexity and intensity. The mean psychological distress score was 7.33, with significantly higher scores observed during the pandemic compared with 2024. However, both positive and negative scores on the cognitive and emotional outcomes instrument were significantly elevated post-pandemic. We observed a heavy care burden, associated with worsened psychological distress. Regarding cognitive-emotional aspects, greater care task complexity was associated with an increase in both negative and positive responses. Policies should offer tailored support for young carers, especially during emergencies, ensure that they receive mental health support, tackle issues associated with young carers' isolation, and deliver accessible and youth-friendly social resources.

Indexed as

CaregiversCOVID-19Psychological DistressStress, PsychologicalAdolescentAdultCognitionCross-Sectional StudiesEmotionsFemaleHumansJapanMaleMental HealthPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Cognition and emotionJapanK6Mental healthPANOC-YC20Young carers

Identifiers

PMID41193603
PMCPMC12589554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.