ArticleScientific reports2025
The impact of continuous intravenous administration of heparin on coagulation dysfunction and organ failure in patients with sepsis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This retrospective cohort study aimed to evaluate the effects of continuous intravenous heparin on coagulation dysfunction, organ failure, and clinical outcomes in sepsis patients. Data from sepsis patients admitted to the ICU of Hebei University Affiliated Hospital (2017-2023) were analyzed, comparing a heparin group (initial dose: 5 U/kg/h, with dosage adjustments targeting an APTT maintained at 1.0-1.5 times the normal value) with a control group receiving prophylactic subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin. Outcomes included platelet count, DIC score, SOFA score, 28-day mortality, and bleeding risk, assessed daily from admission to day 7. At baseline, both groups showed comparable platelet counts, DIC scores, and SOFA scores. By day 3, the heparin group exhibited significantly higher platelet counts than controls (p<0.05), a trend sustained through day 7. DIC scores in the heparin group became significantly lower than controls from day 4 onward (p<0.05). Similarly, SOFA scores in the heparin group were notably reduced compared to controls from day 5 to day 7 (p<0.05). However, no significant differences were observed in 28-day mortality (p>0.05) or bleeding risk between groups. The findings suggest that continuous intravenous heparin improves coagulation dysfunction (reflected by platelet recovery and reduced DIC scores) and mitigates organ failure (evidenced by lower SOFA scores) in sepsis patients. Despite these benefits, heparin did not reduce 28-day mortality. The study highlights heparin's potential role in managing sepsis-related complications but underscores the need for further research to optimize therapeutic strategies for mortality reduction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.