ArticleScientific reports2025
Developing a diagnostic model to differentiate the well-differentiated lipomatous tumors based on clinicopathological characteristics.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- An impressive liposarcomatous neoplasm of the shoulder: Complex diagnostic characterization and best surgical approach in a case of atypical spindle cell pleomorphic lipomatous tumor.Dermatology online journal · 2026Article
- Article
- Liposarcoma: State of the Art-A Scoping Review.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study evaluated the diagnostic value of clinicopathological features and immunohistochemical markers for distinguishing lipomas from atypical lipomatous tumors/well-differentiated liposarcomas (ALT/WDLPS). An integrated diagnostic model for ALT/WDLPS was developed to guide diagnosis, treatment planning, and prognosis. This retrospective analysis included 216 patients with lipomatous tumors diagnosed between February 2018 and December 2024, including lipomas (n = 149), spindle cell lipomas (n = 3), ALTs/WDLPs (n = 62), and WDLPS with a low-grade de-differentiated component (n = 2). Immunohistochemical data for MDM2, CDK4, and p16 were available for 131 patients. MDM2 amplification was significantly more frequent in patients ≥ 55 years and in tumors of the lower limbs (the thigh) and retroperitoneum (p = 0.000). Larger tumor size and multiplicity were also associated with MDM2 amplification (p < 0.05). Immunohistochemistry sensitivities for ALT/WDLPS vs. lipomas: 65% (MDM2), 100% (CDK4), and 80.4% (p16); combined, the specificity was 100% and sensitivity 85.6%. The diagnostic model achieved 93.3% sensitivity and 72.2% specificity. Scores < 0.219 indicated a higher likelihood of lipoma, while scores > 0.652 indicated a higher likelihood of liposarcoma. Age ≥ 55 years, lower extremity/retroperitoneal location, tumor diameter ≥ 9.9 cm, and positive markers were independent risk factors. This model provides an effective tool for ALT/WDLPS identification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.