Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41193577›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Developing a diagnostic model to differentiate the well-differentiated lipomatous tumors based on clinicopathological characteristics.

Jingjing Wu, Zhenzhen Zhang, Fangling Song, Xiangna Chen, Shanshan Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Liposarcoma: State of the Art-A Scoping Review.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jingjing WuDepartment of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, No. 20 Chazhong Road, Taijiang Area, Fuzhou, 350005, Fujian Province, China. 4468726@qq.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5294-8827
Zhenzhen ZhangDepartment of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, No. 20 Chazhong Road, Taijiang Area, Fuzhou, 350005, Fujian Province, China.
Fangling SongDepartment of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, No. 20 Chazhong Road, Taijiang Area, Fuzhou, 350005, Fujian Province, China.
Xiangna ChenDepartment of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, No. 20 Chazhong Road, Taijiang Area, Fuzhou, 350005, Fujian Province, China.
Shanshan HuangDepartment of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, No. 20 Chazhong Road, Taijiang Area, Fuzhou, 350005, Fujian Province, China.

Funding

Talent Recruitment Program of the First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University YJRC3500
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluated the diagnostic value of clinicopathological features and immunohistochemical markers for distinguishing lipomas from atypical lipomatous tumors/well-differentiated liposarcomas (ALT/WDLPS). An integrated diagnostic model for ALT/WDLPS was developed to guide diagnosis, treatment planning, and prognosis. This retrospective analysis included 216 patients with lipomatous tumors diagnosed between February 2018 and December 2024, including lipomas (n = 149), spindle cell lipomas (n = 3), ALTs/WDLPs (n = 62), and WDLPS with a low-grade de-differentiated component (n = 2). Immunohistochemical data for MDM2, CDK4, and p16 were available for 131 patients. MDM2 amplification was significantly more frequent in patients ≥ 55 years and in tumors of the lower limbs (the thigh) and retroperitoneum (p = 0.000). Larger tumor size and multiplicity were also associated with MDM2 amplification (p < 0.05). Immunohistochemistry sensitivities for ALT/WDLPS vs. lipomas: 65% (MDM2), 100% (CDK4), and 80.4% (p16); combined, the specificity was 100% and sensitivity 85.6%. The diagnostic model achieved 93.3% sensitivity and 72.2% specificity. Scores < 0.219 indicated a higher likelihood of lipoma, while scores > 0.652 indicated a higher likelihood of liposarcoma. Age ≥ 55 years, lower extremity/retroperitoneal location, tumor diameter ≥ 9.9 cm, and positive markers were independent risk factors. This model provides an effective tool for ALT/WDLPS identification.

Indexed as

LipomaLiposarcomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorCyclin-Dependent Kinase 4Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16Diagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryMaleMiddle AgedProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mdm2Retrospective StudiesBiomarkers, TumorCDK4 protein, humanCDKN2A protein, humanCyclin-Dependent Kinase 4Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16MDM2 protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mdm2Clinicopathological factorsDiagnostic prediction modelDouble minute homologue 2 (MDM2)Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)Well-differentiated lipomatous tumors

Identifiers

PMID41193577
PMCPMC12589476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.