ArticleScientific reports2025
Utility of clavicle cortex index as a screening tool for low bone mineral density.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This retrospective study examined the relationship between the clavicle cortical index (CCI) and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) bone mineral density (BMD). Data from patients undergoing elective spine and hip surgeries were reviewed, focusing on the bilateral clavicles on chest radiographs. Clavicles were divided into distal, middle-distal, middle-proximal, and proximal. Cortical and trabecular thicknesses were measured in these sections, and the CCI was calculated as (cortical + trabecular)/trabecular bone. The Pearson correlation coefficients were used to assess the CCI and BMDs in the proximal femur, lumbar spine, and distal radius. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to assess the predictive value of the CCI for osteoporosis (BMD < 70%) and Hounsfield units. The study included 219 patients (mean age, 68.03 years). Mild but significant correlations were found between the bilateral middle-distal CCI and BMD in the radius (r = 0.409), with weaker correlations in the femur (r = 0.313) and spine (r = 0.209). ROC analyses for osteoporosis diagnosis were moderately accurate: 0.69 (0.55-0.83, femur), 0.716 (0.57-0.861, spine), and 0.834 (0.737-0.931, radius). The area under the curve for the Hounsfield units was 0.74 (0.55-0.89). The middle-distal CCI showed a correlation with BMDs, especially in the radius. The easy calculation of CCI using routine chest radiographs makes it a valuable osteoporosis screening tool.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.