ArticleScientific reports2025
Analysis of risk factors and construction of nomogram model for nosocomial infection in patients with acute myocardial infarction after percutaneous coronary intervention.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction as a Marker of Vulnerability to Healthcare-Associated Infections in Coronary Care Unit Patients: A Single-Centre Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To analyze the risk factors for hospital-acquired infections following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and to develop a nomogram prediction model. Clinical data from 324 AMI patients who underwent PCI between July 2021 and June 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were categorized into an infection group (n = 39) and a non-infection group (n = 285) based on the occurrence of nosocomial infection postoperatively. Optimal cutoff values were determined using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Independent risk factors for nosocomial infection after PCI were identified through multivariate logistic regression, and a nomogram model was constructed accordingly. The model underwent internal validation via calibration curves, and its predictive performance was assessed using decision curve analysis. No significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of gender, drinking history, smoking history, hypertension, infarct location, or number of stents implanted (all P > 0.05). However, the infection group had significantly higher age, higher prevalence of diabetes, greater proportion of New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III/IV, more frequent invasive procedures, and longer hospital stays (all P < 0.05). ROC analysis identified optimal cutoff values of 60 years for age and 6 days for hospitalization time. Multivariate logistic regression confirmed that age > 60 years, diabetes, NYHA class III/IV, invasive procedures, and hospital stay > 6 days were independent risk factors for nosocomial infection after PCI. The nomogram model demonstrated excellent discrimination, with a C-index of 0.915 (95% CI 0.877-0.953). The calibration curve indicated good agreement between predicted and observed outcomes. The nomogram provided higher net clinical benefit beyond threshold probabilities of 0.24 compared to individual predictors. A nomogram incorporating age, diabetes, cardiac function classification, invasive procedures, and hospitalization time was developed to predict the risk of nosocomial infection in AMI patients after PCI. The model exhibits strong predictive performance and may assist clinicians in identifying high-risk patients for intensified monitoring and preventive strategies. However, as a prognostic tool, it does not directly mitigate infection risk and requires external validation before routine clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.