Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41193563›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Unveiling the role of harmonization on clinically significant prostate cancer detection using MRI.

Nassib Abdallah, Jean-Marie Marion, Kamilia Taguelmimt, Julien Bert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nassib AbdallahLaTIM UMR1101, INSERM, University of Brest, Brest, France. nassib.abdallah@univ-brest.fr.
Jean-Marie MarionLARIS, University of Angers, Angers, France.
Kamilia TaguelmimtLaTIM UMR1101, INSERM, University of Brest, Brest, France.
Julien BertLaTIM UMR1101, INSERM, University of Brest, Brest, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate detection and classification of clinically significant prostate cancer remain critical challenges in medical imaging. Despite numerous studies focusing on feature extraction and classification, none have systematically assessed the impact of harmonization techniques on multicenter imaging data. This study aimed to improve diagnostic performance by integrating harmonization via unsupervised clustering with clinical variables into machine learning models, even when the source center is unknown. We extracted features from T2-weighted magnetic resonance images using two approaches: handcrafted radiomics and deep learning-based representations obtained via a 3D convolutional autoencoder architecture. To address inter-center variability, the data were harmonized using an unsupervised clustering approach that generated 19 distinct clusters, followed by ComBat harmonization. Machine learning classifiers were then trained with and without the inclusion of clinical variables (prostate-specific antigen levels and patient age). The models were evaluated using multiple metrics. Harmonization significantly improved classification performance. In particular, models based on 3D convolutional autoencoder-derived features achieved an accuracy of 75.33% and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.74. The incorporation of clinical variables further enhanced model performance; the best model combining radiomics features with clinical data attained an accuracy of 77.67% and an AUC of 0.85. These performance metrics are concurrent with those reported in the literature for this challenge, demonstrating that our novel approach can effectively mitigate inter-center variability and enhance diagnostic accuracy. Our findings underscore the potential of harmonization via unsupervised clustering, combined with the inclusion of clinical variables, to significantly enhance the diagnostic performance of machine learning models for prostate cancer detection. This novel strategy not only addresses a gap in the current literature but also produces performance metrics comparable to those reported in multicenter studies, thereby supporting the development of robust, clinically applicable diagnostic tools.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingProstatic NeoplasmsAgedDeep LearningHumansMachine LearningMaleMiddle AgedProstate-Specific AntigenProstate-Specific Antigen

Identifiers

PMID41193563
PMCPMC12589461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.