ArticleScientific reports2025
Unveiling the role of harmonization on clinically significant prostate cancer detection using MRI.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reply to the Letter to the Editor: MRI-based habitat analysis for pathologic response prediction after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer-a multicenter study.European radiology · 2026Article
- Automated Prostate Cancer Detection on T2-Weighted MRI Using a Dual-Stream Attention Network: A Study on Private Saudi Clinical Data and Public Benchmark Datasets.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in membranous nephropathy: transforming clinical management toward precision medicine.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate detection and classification of clinically significant prostate cancer remain critical challenges in medical imaging. Despite numerous studies focusing on feature extraction and classification, none have systematically assessed the impact of harmonization techniques on multicenter imaging data. This study aimed to improve diagnostic performance by integrating harmonization via unsupervised clustering with clinical variables into machine learning models, even when the source center is unknown. We extracted features from T2-weighted magnetic resonance images using two approaches: handcrafted radiomics and deep learning-based representations obtained via a 3D convolutional autoencoder architecture. To address inter-center variability, the data were harmonized using an unsupervised clustering approach that generated 19 distinct clusters, followed by ComBat harmonization. Machine learning classifiers were then trained with and without the inclusion of clinical variables (prostate-specific antigen levels and patient age). The models were evaluated using multiple metrics. Harmonization significantly improved classification performance. In particular, models based on 3D convolutional autoencoder-derived features achieved an accuracy of 75.33% and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.74. The incorporation of clinical variables further enhanced model performance; the best model combining radiomics features with clinical data attained an accuracy of 77.67% and an AUC of 0.85. These performance metrics are concurrent with those reported in the literature for this challenge, demonstrating that our novel approach can effectively mitigate inter-center variability and enhance diagnostic accuracy. Our findings underscore the potential of harmonization via unsupervised clustering, combined with the inclusion of clinical variables, to significantly enhance the diagnostic performance of machine learning models for prostate cancer detection. This novel strategy not only addresses a gap in the current literature but also produces performance metrics comparable to those reported in multicenter studies, thereby supporting the development of robust, clinically applicable diagnostic tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.