Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41193557›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Development of a machine learning-based interface for insulin dependency prediction using clinical data.

Vinod Kumar Yata, Om Pritam Das, B V S Lakshmi, M Vaishnavi, Mohd Arif Uddin, Aparna Srikantam, Sarad Pawar Naik Bukke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Vinod Kumar YataDepartment of Pharmacology, School of Allied and Healthcare Sciences, Malla Reddy University, Hyderabad, 500100, Telangana, India.
Om Pritam DasDepartment of Molecular Biology, Central University of Andhra Pradesh, Ananthapuramu, 515701, Andhra Pradesh, India.
B V S LakshmiDepartment of Pharmacology, School of Allied and Healthcare Sciences, Malla Reddy University, Hyderabad, 500100, Telangana, India.
M VaishnaviDepartment of Clinical Research, School of Allied and Healthcare Sciences, Malla Reddy University, Hyderabad, 500100, Telangana, India.
Mohd Arif UddinDepartment of Pharmacology, School of Allied and Healthcare Sciences, Malla Reddy University, Hyderabad, 500100, Telangana, India.
Aparna SrikantamDepartment of Microbiology, School of Allied and Healthcare Sciences, Malla Reddy University, Hyderabad, 500100, Telangana, India.
Sarad Pawar Naik BukkeDepartment of Pharmaceutics and Pharmaceutical Technology, Kampala International University, Western Campus, P.O. Box 71, Ishaka-Bushenyi, Uganda. drsaradpawar@kiu.ac.ug.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5693-2953

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diabetes mellitus is a major global health burden, and early identification of insulin dependency is important for timely intervention. This study developed an artificial intelligence-based diagnostic system using a real-world clinical dataset of 100 anonymized patient records, collected with ethical approval and informed consent. The dataset included demographic, lifestyle, and biochemical variables such as glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting blood sugar (FBS), and postprandial blood sugar (PPBS). After preprocessing to handle missing values, normalize continuous variables, and encode categorical features, four machine learning models were implemented: Logistic Regression, Random Forest, XGBoost, and LightGBM, along with ensemble based, combined approaches. Model evaluation was performed using 5-fold cross-validation with accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score as metrics. XGBoost achieved the highest performance (accuracy 0.88, precision 0.86, recall 0.90, F1-score 0.88), followed by LightGBM (accuracy 0.85, F1-score 0.84), Random Forest (accuracy 0.82, F1-score 0.81), and Logistic Regression (accuracy 0.76, F1-score 0.74). The most predictive features were PPBS and HbA1c, consistent with clinical understanding. While results are promising, they reflect a single-center dataset of 100 records, and should be interpreted as preliminary, further study will include external validation on larger, multi-site cohorts prior to clinical adoption.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusInsulinMachine LearningAdultAgedBlood GlucoseFemaleGlycated HemoglobinHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedBlood GlucoseGlycated HemoglobinInsulinDiabetesEnsemble learningInsulin dependencyLightGBMMachine learningPredictive modeling

Identifiers

PMID41193557
PMCPMC12589506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.