ArticleScientific reports2025
Physiological and yield responses of Camelina sativa to modified Biochar under drought stress.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Microbe-biochar interaction in improving plant growth and water reuse in a green wall system.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Water stress is the most crucial abiotic stress, adversely affecting soil productivity and global food production. The soil productivity can be enhanced by utilizing organic soil conditioners such as organically modified sugarcane bagasse biochar (ASBB) which can potentially enhance crop yield. On the other hand, Pakistan's domestic edible oil production is notably insufficient. Edible oil holds the position as the top food import commodity in Pakistan. So, there is a dire need to enhance the domestic oil production in Pakistan. The present work intends to explore the influence of ASBB on yield attributes of Camelina sativa growing under three different levels of irrigation (100%, 70%, and 50% moisture of field capacity). A field experiment was conducted in the Botanical Garden, at University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan, in Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with three replicates during 2023-2024. Water stress adversely affected the morphological, physiological, biochemical and yield related attributes of Camelina sativa in soil without ASBB amendment under 50% moisture of field capacity. However, ASBB improved the plant growth parameters in both 5 tons per hectare (T) and 10T amendments. However, the highest improvement was recorded in 10T ASBB in leaf relative water content, (20%, 19.6%, and 30.25%) and total chlorophyll content (131%, 78%, and 61%), when grown under 100%,70%, and 50% irrigation, respectively, in contrast to without ASBB amendment. Leaf proline content and antioxidant enzymes activities (SOD, POD, CAT) enhanced under 70% and 50% irrigation while declined under 100% irrigation in soil without ASBB amendment. However, 10T ASBB improved branches per plant (61%, 56.5%, and 57%), pods per branch (67.5%, 66%, and 61%), 100 seed weight (20.9%, 19%, and 24%), and seed production per plant (5.6-folds, 4.2-folds, and 5.5-folds) under 100%, 70% and 50% irrigation. So, present work concluded that modified ASBB amendment in soil has been incredibly beneficial for improving crop productivity by enhancing water-use efficiency, leaf water status, and pigment stability in Camelina sativa in deficit irrigation systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.