Observational studyScientific reports2025
Diagnostic utility of high-mobility group box 1 for acute exacerbations of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.
Observational study in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There are no established biomarkers for acute exacerbations in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (AE-IPF). The bronchoalveolar lavage fluid of patients with IPF notably has elevations in high-mobility group box 1 protein (HMGB1), a nuclear non-histone chromosomal protein that functions as an alarmin that perpetuates the inflammatory process. This study investigated the potential of serum HMGB1 levels as a diagnostic marker for AE-IPF. This prospective, multicenter, observational cohort study included 779 HMGB1 readings from 269 Japanese patients with IPF. Diagnostic performance was assessed using four different methods of recording serial HMGB1 measurements rather than relying on a simple comparison between stable IPF and AE-IPF. Additionally, KL-6 was measured in cases of stable IPF and AE-IPF. A comparative analysis for the usefulness of HMGB1 and KL-6 as biomarkers for AE-IPF was performed. The cohort accounted for 505.6 person-years, with a mean follow-up duration of 1.88 years. A total of 46 cases with AE were recorded with their corresponding HMGB1 levels. All four diagnostic methods examined had high diagnostic accuracy (area under the curve > 0.75). HMGB1 had significantly better diagnostic performance than KL-6. HMGB1 demonstrated high diagnostic utility in AE-IPF, which can be used to facilitate earlier diagnosis and treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.