ArticleScientific reports2025
CBCT based three dimensional odontometric mapping of maxillary anterior teeth in an Indian cohort to guide precision endodontic access cavity preparation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Access cavity preparation is an important part of endodontic therapy, affecting the effectiveness of canal instrumentation and the durability of the tooth over time. Currently, most access preparation protocols are based on information from a Western population and do not address the anatomical differences of different ethnic groups. This retrospective CBCT study assessed specific odontometric measurements in maxillary anterior teeth-central incisors, lateral incisors and canines-using an Indian population to help identify a clinically relevant and conservative access cavity preparation. A total of six hundred cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images of maxillary central incisors, lateral incisors, and canines (n = 200 per tooth) were evaluated. Three measurements were made in sagittal view: the distance from the central fossa to the pulp chamber roof (CF-PC), the incisal edge to pulp chamber (IE-PC), and the central fossa to cingulum (CF-C). These images were obtained from Indian individuals aged 18 to 25 years. Differences attributable to sex-based variation, and between teeth, were statistically significant (p < 0.05). The lateral incisors had the largest amount of anatomical variability, while the canines had the steepest trajectory of access. These findings provide the first population-based CBCT base-line morphometric values for maxillary anterior teeth in India, and a practical guide to help achieve safe access design that is mindful of tooth anatomy and minimizes the invasiveness of the access.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.