ArticleScientific reports2025
Bilateral paravertebral block reduces complications after pancreatectomy in retrospective cohort analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To investigate the effects of paravertebral block (PVB) on postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) and major complications in adult pancreatic surgery. All data of patients who underwent pancreatic surgery at Changhai hospital between January 2017 and June 2021 were retrieved. According to whether they received PVB or not, the patients were divided into the PVB and non-PVB groups. POPF-related factors were balanced by covariate balancing propensity score (CBPS) based inverse probability weighting. After that, the POPF and postoperative major complications between the two groups were compared. Another propensity score matching, multivariate logistic regression and instrumental variable regression were employed for sensitivity analysis. Results of sensitivity analysis were expressed as relative risk (RR) or odd ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). A total of 3360 patients were included in the study, with 374 patients in PVB group and 2986 patients in non-PVB group. After CBPS, there was no significant difference in incidence (5.7% VS 6.2%, P = 0.785) between the groups (PVB VS non-PVB). Postoperative nasogastric tube retention time (2d VS 3d, P < 0.001), and length of hospital stay (11d VS 12d, P = 0.031) were significantly reduced in the PVB group. delayed gastric emptying (DGE) (RR 0.476; 95% CI 0.262-0.863; P = 0.014) and postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH) (RR 0.426; 95% CI 0.287-0.630; P < 0.001) were reduced more than 50% in PVB group. PVB did not increase the risk of POPF, but reduced DGE and PPH by more than 50%, and improved postoperative recovery after pancreatectomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.