ArticleScientific data2025
Dataset on Forest Bird Communities: Fragmentation Metrics & Manipulated Social Information Cues.
Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Nature conservation aims to prevent species loss, often driven by habitat fragmentation. While island biogeography theory informs many models, animals consider both habitat structure but also on the social conditions in a given area when selecting territories. Individuals assess resource availability, competition, and predation risk through social cues, yet the interaction between such information (attractive vs. repulsive) and the physical properties of the habitat remains poorly understood. We provide data on both, habitat features (forest parameters and fragmentation metrics) and bird populations along with a large-scale experiment manipulating social information sources (attractive: common forest bird species, repulsive: common forest predator, mixed: attractive and repulsive alternated), testing how different local conditions scenarios affect bird populations. These data can inform broader analyses of bird responses to environmental and social factors, supporting large-scale assessments of habitat selection and population trends. Comparing effect sizes across similar studies can reveal spatiotemporal trends in bird population responses to the interaction of social and environmental cues on larger scales.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.