ArticleScientific data2025
Real-world chemistry lab image dataset for equipment recognition across 25 apparatus categories.
Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Real-world chemistry lab image dataset for equipment recognition across 25 apparatus categories.Scientific data · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In modern laboratories, automation and safety rely heavily on accurately detecting and identifying laboratory equipment. To address this need, we introduce a comprehensive and well-curated dataset designed to detect 25 commonly used chemistry lab apparatuses. The dataset comprises 4,599 JPG-format images captured under diverse real-world conditions, including varying lighting, backgrounds, angles, overlaps, and distances - factors that enhance the robustness and generalizability of model training. It is split into training (70%), validation (20%), and testing (10%) subsets. This resource is particularly valuable for developing laboratory automation systems, with potential applications in safety monitoring, inventory management, and real-time tracking of lab tools. We evaluated the dataset using seven state-of-the-art object detection models, all achieving impressive performance with mAP@50 scores exceeding 0.9: RF-DETR (0.992), YOLOv11 (0.987), YOLOv9 (0.986), YOLOv5 (0.985), YOLOv8 (0.983), YOLOv7 (0.947), and YOLOv12 (0.92). To the best of our knowledge, this is the most extensive publicly available dataset of its kind, covering 25 categories of chemistry laboratory apparatuses and establishing a strong foundation for future research in laboratory automation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.