Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41193437›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

A quantitative comparison of the fingerprint of twinned microstructures through surface and three-dimensional techniques.

Duncan A Greeley, Hi T Vo, Rodney J McCabe, Matthew M Schneider, Carlos N Tomé, Laurent Capolungo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Duncan A Greeley *Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, USA.
Hi T Vo *Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, USA.
Rodney J McCabeLos Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6684-7410
Matthew M SchneiderLos Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7425-7736
Carlos N ToméLos Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3405-0500
Laurent CapolungoLos Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, USA. laurent@lanl.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8079-7790

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Assessing the fingerprint of a material's microstructure is key for supporting materials design. With the emergence of a wide range of 3D characterization techniques, it is critical to understand the main differences in fingerprints reconstructed from 2D and 3D datasets. To this end, we introduce a graph-based microstructure reconstruction framework that enables structural comparisons of twin domain networks in high purity Ti using 3D and 2D electron backscatter diffraction. Insights into the structure of the twin networks are facilitated by combining statistical analysis of twin crystallography with visual and graphical analysis of the novel graph abstractions of the twins. We demonstrate that compared to 3D reconstructions, conventional 2D views of twinning miss key aspects of the microstructure including the high interconnectivity of domains into networks that span the full reconstruction volume. The reduced cross-grain and in-grain twin connectivity typically observed in 2D has notable implications on our understanding of how twinning mediates the plastic response of microstructures and how twin networks evolve. It is thus clear that 3D characterization is critical for accurately inferring both twin network morphologies as well as the key unit processes facilitating network formation.

Identifiers

PMID41193437
PMCPMC12589530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.