Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41193257›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2026

Bridging Model and Experiment in Systems Neuroscience with Cleo: The Closed-Loop, Electrophysiology, and Optophysiology Simulation Testbed.

Kyle A Johnsen, Nathanael A Cruzado, Zachary C Menard, Adam A Willats, Adam S Charles, Jeffrey E Markowitz, Christopher J Rozell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kyle A JohnsenCoulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia 30332.
Nathanael A CruzadoSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332.
Zachary C MenardSchool of Physics, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332.
Adam A WillatsCoulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia 30332.
Adam S CharlesDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218.
Jeffrey E MarkowitzCoulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia 30332.
Christopher J RozellSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332 crozell@gatech.edu.

Funding

Training in Computational Neural EngineeringT32EB025816 · NIBIB · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI Michael Robert Borich, Christopher John Rozell · 2019 to 2026
$1.9M
CRCNS: Closed-Loop Computational Neuroscience for Causally Dissecting CircuitsR01NS115327 · NINDS · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI ROZELL, CHRISTOPHER JOHN, STANLEY, GARRETT B. · 2019 to 2023
$1.6M
NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB025816NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS115327
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Systems neuroscience has experienced an explosion of new tools for reading and writing neural activity, enabling exciting new experiments (e.g., all-optical interrogation, closed-loop control) for interrogating neural circuits. Unfortunately, these advances have drastically increased the complexity of designing experiments, with ad hoc decisions often resulting in suboptimal or even failed experiments. Bridging model and experiment via simulation can help solve this problem, leveraging advances in computational models to provide a low-cost testbed for experiment design, model validation, and methods engineering. Specifically, we require an integrated approach that incorporates simulation of the experimental interface into computational models, but no existing tool integrates optogenetics, two-photon calcium imaging, electrode recording, and flexible closed-loop processing with neural population simulations. To address this need, we have developed Cleo: the Closed-Loop, Electrophysiology, and Optophysiology experiment simulation testbed. Cleo is a Python package enabling injection of virtual recording and stimulation devices as well as closed-loop control with realistic latency into a Brian spiking neural network model. Notably, it is the only publicly available tool to date simulating two-photon and multi-opsin/wavelength optogenetics. To facilitate adoption and extension by the community, Cleo is open-source, modular, tested, and documented, and can export results to various data formats. Here we describe the design and features of Cleo, evaluate output of individual components and integrated experiments, and demonstrate its utility for advancing optogenetic techniques in prospective experiments using previously published systems neuroscience models.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationModels, NeurologicalNeurosciencesSoftwareAnimalsHumansOptogeneticsclosed-loop stimulationelectrophysiologyopen-source softwareoptogeneticsspiking neural networkstwo-photon calcium imaging

Identifiers

PMID41193257
PMCPMC12782756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.