Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41193255›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2025

Brief Encounters with Real Objects Modulate the Medial Parietal But Not Occipitotemporal Cortex.

Susan G Wardle, Beth Rispoli, Vinai Roopchansingh, Chris I Baker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Susan G WardleSection on Learning and Plasticity, Laboratory of Brain and Cognition, National Institute of Mental Health, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland 20814 susan.wardle@nih.gov.ORCID 0000-0003-2216-7461
Beth RispoliSection on Learning and Plasticity, Laboratory of Brain and Cognition, National Institute of Mental Health, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland 20814.
Vinai RoopchansinghFunctional MRI Facility, National Institute of Mental Health, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland 20814.
Chris I BakerSection on Learning and Plasticity, Laboratory of Brain and Cognition, National Institute of Mental Health, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland 20814.ORCID 0000-0001-6861-8964

Funding

Object, face, body and scene representations in the human brainZIAMH002909 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI BAKER, CHRIS · 2009 to 2025
$25.5M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA MH002909
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans are skilled at recognizing everyday objects from pictures, even if we have never encountered the depicted object in real life. However, if we have encountered an object, how does that real-world experience affect the representation of its photographic image in the human brain? We developed a paradigm that involved brief real-world manual exploration of everyday objects prior to the measurement of brain activity with fMRI while viewing pictures of those objects (40 participants, 28 females). We found that while object-responsive regions in the lateral occipital and ventral temporal cortex contained robust visual representations of specific objects, those representations were not modulated by brief real-world exploration. However, there was an effect of visual experience in object-responsive regions in the form of repetition suppression of the BOLD response over repeated presentations of the object images. Real-world experience with an object produced foci of increased activation in the medial parietal and posterior cingulate cortex, regions that have previously been associated with the encoding and retrieval of remembered items in explicit memory paradigms. Our discovery that these regions are engaged during spontaneous recognition of real-world objects from their 2D image demonstrates that modulation of activity in medial regions by familiarity is neither stimulus nor task-specific. Overall, our results support separable coding in the human brain of the visual appearance of an object from the associations gained via real-world experience. The richness of object representations beyond their photographic image has important implications for understanding object recognition in the human brain and in computational models.

Indexed as

Occipital LobeParietal LobePattern Recognition, VisualRecognition, PsychologyTemporal LobeAdultBrain MappingFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePhotic StimulationYoung AdultfMRIinvarianceobject recognitionoccipitotemporal cortexreal-worldvisual memory

Identifiers

PMID41193255
PMCPMC12696635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.