Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41193232›Full record

Trial reportRMD open2025

Long-term safety and efficacy of upadacitinib in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response to conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 5-year results from the SELECT-SUNRISE randomised controlled trial.

Hideto Kameda, Tsutomu Takeuchi, Kunihiro Yamaoka, Motohiro Oribe, Mitsuhiro Kawano, Yuko Konishi, Sumi Chonan, Kimitoshi Ikeda, Heidi S Camp, Yoshiya Tanaka

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in RMD open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Hideto KamedaDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Toho University, Tokyo, Japan hideto.kameda@med.toho-u.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0002-4330-5782
Tsutomu TakeuchiDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Kunihiro YamaokaDepartment of Rheumatology and Infectious Diseases, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan.
Motohiro OribeDepartment of Internal Medicine, Oribe Clinic of Rheumatism and Medicine, Oita, Japan.
Mitsuhiro KawanoDepartment of Hematology and Immunology, Kanazawa Medical University, Ishikawa, Japan.
Yuko KonishiAbbVie GK, Tokyo, Japan.
Sumi ChonanAbbVie GK, Tokyo, Japan.
Kimitoshi IkedaAbbVie GK, Tokyo, Japan.
Heidi S CampAbbVie, Inc, North Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Yoshiya TanakaDepartment of Molecular Targeted Therapeutics, University of Occupational and Environmental Health Japan, Kitakyushu, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0807-7139

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the long-term safety and efficacy of upadacitinib over 5 years in Japanese patients with moderate-to-severe active rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to stable doses of conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs-IR).

methodsJapanese patients received upadacitinib 7.5, 15 or 30 mg once per day or placebo for 12 weeks in a double-blind, randomised manner. Patients who completed the placebo-controlled phase entered a long-term extension phase during which they continued the same upadacitinib dose or were switched from placebo to upadacitinib 7.5, 15 or 30 mg once per day. Blinding was maintained until dose switching from upadacitinib 30 mg to 15 mg, prior to the regulatory approval of 15 mg; the earliest switch occurred at week 132. Safety and efficacy were evaluated through week 260.

resultsIn total, 121/187 (64.7%) patients who entered the long-term extension phase completed the study. The types and frequency of adverse events were comparable with those reported at week 84 and in other studies of upadacitinib. The incidences of any adverse events, serious adverse events, infection and serious infection were numerically higher on upadacitinib 15 and 30 mg than on 7.5 mg. Clinical outcomes were improved and maintained over 260 weeks; Clinical Disease Activity Index clinical remission rates after 5 years were 40.8%, 26.5% and 28.0% on upadacitinib 7.5, 15 and 30 mg, respectively (non-responder imputation).

conclusionsUpadacitinib showed sustained efficacy with no new safety signals identified through 5 years of treatment and is a long-term treatment option for Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis and csDMARDs-IR.

Indexed as

Antirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidHeterocyclic Compounds, 3-RingAdultAgedDouble-Blind MethodEast Asian PeopleFemaleHumansJapanMaleMiddle AgedSeverity of Illness IndexTreatment OutcomeAntirheumatic AgentsHeterocyclic Compounds, 3-RingupadacitinibAntirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidAutoimmune Diseases

Identifiers

PMID41193232
PMCPMC12612774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.