Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41193023›Full record

ArticleThe western journal of emergency medicine2025

Potential Impact of Using Canadian Syncope Risk Score on Emergency Department Hospitalizations for Syncope.

Andrea W Harris, Lindsie LaBonte, Guido Massaccesi, Benoit Stryckman, Bennett A Myers, Daniel B Gingold, R Gentry Wilkerson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The western journal of emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Andrea W HarrisJohns Hopkins Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Lindsie LaBonteUniversity of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Guido MassaccesiUniversity of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Benoit StryckmanUniversity of Maryland School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Bennett A MyersUniversity of Maryland School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Daniel B GingoldUniversity of Maryland School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
R Gentry WilkersonUniversity of Maryland School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.

Funding

Percutaneous Ultrasound Gastrostomy: Clinical Evaluation of a Novel Method for Feeding Tube PlacementR44DK115325 · NIDDK · COAPTECH, LLC · PI CAROLAN, HOWARD · 2019 to 2020
$1.2M
NIDDK NIH HHS R44 DK115325
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSyncope is a common emergency department (ED) presentation and frequently results in low-yield hospitalizations. The Canadian Syncope Risk Score (CSRS) is a validated risk stratification score that identifies 30-day risk of serious adverse events for patients presenting with syncope. In this retrospective, cross-sectional study we aimed to evaluate syncope admissions with the CSRS to determine potentially unnecessary hospitalizations.

methodsWe identified patient visits for syncope at 11 EDs from February 2019-January 2020. We excluded patients with additional serious diagnoses that would have independently required admission and those who were discharged. We then randomly sampled the remaining charts until finding 200 that met study inclusion criteria on full chart review. We retrospectively calculated CSRS via manual chart review and identified the proportion of patients with low-risk CSRS. We compared demographic characteristics between those with low- vs medium- and high-risk CSRS.

resultsWe identified 5,718 adult patients hospitalized for syncope. Of these patient visits 3,999 were initially excluded, 336 were sampled, and 200 included for analysis. Of these, 39% (77/200, 95% CI 32-46%]) were low risk (CSRS < 1). Patients with low-risk CSRSs were younger (61.2 years vs 70.6 years of age; absolute difference [AD] 9.4 years; 95% CI 4.8-13.9), less likely to have heart disease (1.3% vs 61.8%; AD 60.5%, 95% CI -69.4% to -51.5%), and more likely to have substance use disorder (14.3% vs 4.9%; AD 9.4%, 95% CI 0.7-18.1%).

conclusionIn this sample of patients hospitalized for syncope, 39% had low-risk Canadian Syncope Risk Score. Had the CSRS been used, these patients could have been safely discharged, as their estimated 30-day serious adverse event rate was < 1%. Wider adoption of the CSRS could potentially reduce unnecessary hospitalizations for patients with syncope.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalHospitalizationSyncopeAdultAgedCanadaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID41193023
PMCPMC12591636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.