ArticleThe western journal of emergency medicine2025
Comparison of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality in a Simulated Model: At Incident Scene vs During EMS Transport.
Article in The western journal of emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionOut-of-hospital cardiac arrest remains a leading cause of death and significantly impacts global health outcomes. International guidelines emphasize the importance of high-quality CPR (cardiopulmonary resuscitation).
objectivesOur goal was to compare CPR efficiency using the criteria recommended by international guidelines between two out-of-hospital cardiac arrest intervention scenarios: CPR at the incident site; and CPR during patient transport to the hospital by emergency medical services.
methodsIn each of the two scenarios, five full two-minute cycles of cardiac compression were applied to a manikin according to international guidelines. The CPR quality parameters were chest compression rate, chest compression depth recorded by the manikin, and investigator-evaluated correct hand placement on the manikin.
resultsWe analyzed data from 240 CPR cycles provided by 24 healthcare professionals. The mean chest compression rate was higher (120.5±10.9/minutes vs 125.3±14.7/min, P = .001) and the mean chest compression depth was shallower (43.9±6.6 millimeters [mm] vs 37.9±7.2 mm, P = .001) in the on-the-move group. The two groups' appropriate hand placement rates were similar (92.1±5.4% vs 92.2±4.5%, P = .48)
conclusionIn this study, the moving ambulance simulation demonstrated that chest compressions were administered at a rate exceeding recommended guidelines and at a shallower depth than recommended, while the frequency of correct hand placement remained comparable. If the patient requires transportation from the scene of the incident, the healthcare team must be aware of the potential adverse effects on the chest compression quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.