ArticleThe western journal of emergency medicine2025
Emergency Medical Services Policies and Perspectives Leading to Ambulance Engine Idling.
Article in The western journal of emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAmbulances are often left to idle, which may contribute to maintenance costs, environmental harm, and resource inefficiencies. Engine idling affects the health of first responders due to the consequences of exhaust. Our study objective was to gain understanding of current emergency medical services (EMS) policies and perspectives on ambulance engine idling.
methodsWe designed an anonymous, 48-question survey that was distributed to all levels of EMS clinicians. There were 684 total survey responses from 11 states. We excluded those that only included demographics, yielding 507 responses. The response rate was 10.8%. The questions surveyed demographics, service characteristics, and current policies and perspectives on idling. We used multiple question types, including some that asked participants to rate their level of concern on a five-point Likert scale. "Strongly disagree" was coded as 1, and "strongly agree" was coded as 5. "Neither agree or disagree" was considered a neutral response and was coded as 3. Additionally, we conducted a thematic analysis on data derived from the free-text responses to identify themes.
resultsFew (12%) respondents reported written policies on idling. The biggest concerns regarding idling involved the following (reported as median (IQR, 25
conclusionEmergency medical services clinicians mainly hesitate to turn off their engines out of concern for patient/personnel harm and potential equipment failure. The theme of frustration, noted in free-text responses, describes EMS clinicians' feelings of suspicion and concern for an ulterior motive behind the study, which highlights the need for a collaborative effort at addressing this collective issue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.