Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41193002›Full record

ArticleThe western journal of emergency medicine2025

Prior Outpatient Care Use in Emergency Department Patients with Low- and High-acuity Conditions in Germany.

Yves N Wu, Martin Möckel, Dörte Huscher, Antje Fischer-Rosinský, Thomas Keil, Anna Slagman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The western journal of emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yves N WuCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Emergency and Acute Medicine (CVK, CCM), Berlin, Germany.
Martin MöckelCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Emergency and Acute Medicine (CVK, CCM), Berlin, Germany.
Dörte HuscherCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Institute of Medical Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Berlin, Germany.
Antje Fischer-RosinskýCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Emergency and Acute Medicine (CVK, CCM), Berlin, Germany.
Thomas KeilCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Institute of Social Medicine, Epidemiology and Health Economics, Berlin, Germany.
Anna SlagmanCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Emergency and Acute Medicine (CVK, CCM), Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe key role of emergency departments (ED) is to treat severe and life-threatening cases. A rise in ED visits, particularly for low-acuity conditions, places a burden on resources which may hinder efficient care for high-acuity conditions. We investigated the association between previous outpatient healthcare services use and low-acuity visits in EDs in Germany.

methodsWe analyzed data from the Initiative for Emergency Department Evaluation and Data Collection project, with 454,747 ED visits by 353,926 patients collected from 16 EDs in Germany in 2016. We included a subset of 228,753 (64.6%) patients with 299,914 (66.0%) visits from 12 of the participating EDs for which outpatient care data was available. We categorized ED presentations into low- or high-acuity based on transportation to the ED, triage category, hospital admission status, and intrahospital mortality. By merging patient hospital records with outpatient billing information, we assessed outpatient care utilization prior to ED visits. Using a generalized mixed-effects model, we investigated the relationship between acuity level and outpatient care utilization, adjusting for age, sex, and type of residential area.

resultsLow-acuity patients were considerably younger than high-acuity (mean age ± standard deviation: 45 ±19 vs 58 ±21 years) and used outpatient services less often within 10 days prior to their ED visit: 40.6% vs 49.5%. Key associations for low-acuity ED visits included younger age (per 10-year categories: adjusted odds ratios 0.72, 95% confidence interval 0.72-0.73), urban residence (1.17; 1.13-1.22), and timing of the last outpatient contact. Longer durations since the last outpatient contact were associated with a higher likelihood of presenting to the ED with low-acuity symptoms. Compared to patients who visited their primary care physician (PCP) shortly before their ED visit, those with PCP contact 1-6 months (1.22; 1.19-1.25) and over six months prior (1.33; 1.26-1.41) were more likely to present with low-acuity conditions.

conclusionWhile almost half of both low- and high-acuity patient groups utilized outpatient services prior to the ED visit, low-acuity patients were generally younger and had fewer such contacts. The majority had accessed both primary care and the ED, challenging the assumption that low-acuity patients routinely bypass outpatient care before seeking emergency services. This raises the question of what limitations or unaddressed needs in outpatient care drive these patients to seek subsequent care in the ED. More research is needed to explore the structural and systemic factors influencing low-acuity ED visits.

Indexed as

Ambulatory CareEmergency Service, HospitalPatient Acceptance of Health CarePatient AcuityAdultAgedFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedTriage

Identifiers

PMID41193002
PMCPMC12591612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.