ArticleThe western journal of emergency medicine2025
Analysis of Emergency Department-based Intensive Care Units on Coding and Revenue.
Article in The western journal of emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Variation in Emergency Department Experience With Pediatric Critical Illness.Annals of emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Documenting Clinical Complexity: A Model for Improving Documentation and Billing in Transplant Infectious Diseases.Transplant infectious disease : an official journal of the Transplantation SocietyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionEmergency department-based intensive care units (ED-ICU) address the increasing demand for critical care services and represent a transformative approach to the specialty's management of critically ill patients within emergency medicine. However, data on their financial impact and operational effects remain limited.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective, quasi-experimental study at an urban, academic ED with approximately 90,000 annual visits. In July 2019, a nine-bed ED-ICU model, referred to as "Next Pod," was implemented. We analyzed Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) coding data and professional revenue (charges billed and payments received) for 35 weeks before and after the intervention (November 2018-March 2020). The intervention involved repurposing a nine-bed ED area and adjusting physician and nursing staffing models. We compared critical and non-critical care CPT coding proportions and professional revenue using the Student t-test.
resultsDuring the study period, there were 38,283 ED visits pre-implementation and 36,424 visits post-implementation. Across the entire ED, critical care coding significantly increased following implementation (CPT 99291: 6.2 - 8.8% [total percentage increase of 41.94%]; 99292: 0.5 - 1.0% [total percentage increase of 100%]). Encounters where 99292 was billed multiple times increased by 128.1% (32 vs 73). Non-critical care coding (99282, 99283) decreased 23% (9.1% vs 7.0%, P< .001) / 29.6% (16.2 vs 11.4, P < .001), respectively. There was a non-statistically significant increase in 99284. Higher acuity codes (99285) increased by 10% (31.7% vs. 34.9%, P < .001). Average ED charges per visit increased by $40 (95% CI $37.2 - $45.5) post-implementation..
conclusionThe implementation of an ED-ICU was associated with significant increases in critical care and high-acuity coding, as well as enhanced professional revenue. These findings suggest that ED-ICU models can improve both fiscal performance and operational efficiency. Further research is needed to explore the contributions of resource allocation, documentation improvements, and care practices to these outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.