ArticleThe western journal of emergency medicine2025
Physician Attitudes on Integration of Prehospital Patient Care Report into Hospital Electronic Health Record.
Article in The western journal of emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPrehospital information is valuable but often under-used by physicians. In both the emergency and inpatient settings, information about a patient's condition prior to their arrival is important to provide optimal care. Historically, prehospital responders' electronic patient care reports (ePCR) have not been integrated with the hospital's electronic health record (EHR). In this study, we aimed to assess physician attitudes towards the ePCR and patient care decisions before and after integration of prehospital ePCR and hospital EHR systems. We hypothesized that this would increase accessibility and use of prehospital ePCR in patient care decisions.
methodsIn 2023, our local academic health center implemented software that made prehospital documentation available to hospital staff within 30 minutes of patient arrival to the emergency department (ED). Before this, we surveyed attendings, fellows, and residents from both the ED and internal medicine (IM) department on their attitudes and behaviors regarding ePCR and clinical practice. We administered the same survey six months after implementation, and compared responses with a Wilcoxon signed-rank test.
resultsSixty-six physicians responded to the pre survey, including 39 (59.1%) from the ED and 27 (40.9%) from the IM department. Fifty-two completed the post survey, including 33 (63.5%) emergency physicians and 19 (36.5%) IM physicians. The pre- survey response rates were 92.9% and 54% for the ED and IM groups, respectively, while the post-survey response rates were 84.6% and 70.4%. Change in rank was significant (P < .01) for the following categories: knowledge;, ability; ease of use; time to access; and frequency of accessing the ePCR. Change in rank was not significant for the importance of ePCR in patient care and medical decision-making, and whether the ePCR would be used more frequently if it were easier to access.
conclusionPre- and post-survey responses regarding accessibility showed a significant change in rank, while the importance of the ePCR on clinical decision-making did not. This suggests that while system integration increased accessibility to prehospital information, it did not significantly alter patient care decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.