Observational studyThe western journal of emergency medicine2025
Refusal of Emergency Medical Transport After a Fall: Patient Characteristics and Outcomes of Repeat Callers.
Observational study in The western journal of emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionLift assistance represents a high proportion of emergency medical services (EMS) calls, yet data is limited regarding the long-term outcomes of these patients who subsequently refuse transport. In this study, our objective was to examine the outcomes of patients who require lift assistance but refuse transport and to determine factors associated with repeated EMS utilization.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective, observational cohort study of EMS calls in southern New Jersey in patients ≥18 years of age who declined EMS transport after a fall between July 1, 2021-July 1, 2022. Repeat callers were defined as making one additional call within 30 days, and we defined super-users as those making ≥four calls within six months. The primary outcome was repeat emergency department (ED) visits within 30 days from the initial transport refusal visit.
resultsWe analyzed 116 of 203 (57%) patients. The mean patient age was 66.3 years, and 53.6% were female. Forty-seven (37.9%) patients were repeat callers, and 27 (21.8%) were super-users. Repeat callers and super-users had increased odds of 30-day ED visits (odds ratio [OR] 17.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] 6.4-47.6, and OR 8.8, 95% CI 3.3-23.7, respectively), and six-month ED visits (OR 4.9, 95% CI 2.2-11.2, and OR 12.9, 95% CI 3.9-56.5). Similarly, there were increased odds of 30-day admission for repeat and super-user callers (OR 6.6, 95% CI 2.5-18.2, and OR 10.8, 95% CI 4.0-29.8, respectively), and six-month admissions (OR 3.0, 95% CI 1.4-6.5,and OR 6.8, 95% CI 2.6-19.9, respectively). No differences in death at one year were observed in either group (repeat callers OR 1.4, 95% CI 0.4-4.5; super-users OR 1.1, 95% CI 0.2-4.1) Repeat callers had higher proportions of anticoagulation/antiplatelet therapy and non-ambulatory status (42.9% vs 61.7%, P=.046 and 29.0% vs 56.8%, P=.006, respectively).
conclusionRepeat EMS calls for lift assistance may be used to identify patients at high risk for ED visits and hospitalizations. As patients decline transport, EMS may be their sole healthcare encounter. Future directions would entail training EMS personnel in screening or referring patients for more intensive outpatient interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.