Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41192820›Full record

ArticleThe clinical teacher2025

Peer Mentoring as a Community of Practice in Medical Education.

Jun Jie Lim, Vivian Andaya Verbo, Gunjan Khandelwal, Nadine Hayudini Nograles

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The clinical teacher, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jun Jie LimNewcastle University Medicine Malaysia, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Iskandar Puteri, Malaysia.ORCID 0009-0008-5213-9334
Vivian Andaya VerboNewcastle University Medicine Malaysia, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Iskandar Puteri, Malaysia.
Gunjan KhandelwalNewcastle University Medicine Malaysia, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Iskandar Puteri, Malaysia.ORCID 0009-0000-8313-5047
Nadine Hayudini NogralesNewcastle University Medicine Malaysia, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Iskandar Puteri, Malaysia.ORCID 0009-0003-7060-159X

Funding

Faculty of Medical Science Educational Research, Development & Practice Network Development Grants, Newcastle University
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFirst-year medical students often face significant challenges adjusting to the demands of medical school. Although the benefits of peer mentoring are well documented, less is understood about how these relationships support development for both mentees and mentors. This study explored how peer mentoring relationships were formed, maintained and contributed to students' academic, social and professional growth.

methodsThe study was conducted in 2021-2022 at the Southeast Asian branch campus of a UK medical school, where second-year students mentored first-year students through a nine-month voluntary peer mentoring programme. Mentors completed structured training and met regularly with their mentees across the academic year. A concurrent nested mixed-method design was used, incorporating modified surveys and semi-structured focus groups. Reflexive thematic analysis was guided by the Community of Practice (CoP) framework.

findingsTwenty-three mentors and mentees participated in focus groups, whereas 64 mentees and 12 mentors completed the survey. Participants described a strong sense of purpose, rooted in a desire to help others and give back through peer mentoring. Mentoring fostered connection, belonging and professional identity through collaboration, emotional support and open communication. Participants gained practical benefits such as academic assistance, smoother social integration and strengthened interpersonal skills. Challenges included disengagement, cultural differences and mismatched expectations.

conclusionThis study highlights how the CoP framework fosters effective mentoring relationships, where shared goals, mutual engagement and collective practices promote academic, social and professional development. Educators should apply this framework to build inclusive, supportive communities, with future research exploring long-term outcomes and cultural responsiveness.

Indexed as

MentoringMentorsPeer GroupStudents, MedicalAdultCommunity of PracticeFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited KingdomCommunity of Practice (CoP)medical educationmentorship programmesnear‐peer mentoringpeer mentoringstudent development

Identifiers

PMID41192820
PMCPMC12588802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.