ArticleThe Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology2026
Trends in the Use and Indications for Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Between 2005 and 2017: A State-Wide Descriptive Cohort Analysis.
Article in The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comment on: 'Trends in the Use and Indications for Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Between 2005 and 2017'-Re-Framing the Problem: Is Non-Indicated ICSI a Form of Low-Value Care in Reproductive Medicine?The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology · 2026Article
- Trends in the Use and Indications for Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Between 2005 and 2017: A State-Wide Descriptive Cohort Analysis.The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIntracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) was first developed to overcome male factor infertility. ICSI has increased in uptake globally, including in cases where its use is non-essential for fertilisation.
aimsTo identify temporal trends in the use of, and indications for ICSI in an Australian context. MATERIALS AND
methodsA statewide descriptive cohort study examining the trends in ICSI uptake and reported indication/s for ICSI use. The cohort included women undergoing IVF between 2005 and 2017 at IVF clinics across Victoria, Australia that resulted in a birth after 20 weeks' gestation.
resultsThe dataset comprised 32 102 assisted reproduction cycles: 22 873 (71.3%) ICSI and 9229 (28.7%) conventional IVF. In 2005, ICSI accounted for 60.6% (1182/1952) of cycles, increasing to 79.5% (2344/2947) by 2017 (p
conclusionsDuring our study period, the total use of ICSI increased by 18.9%. Notably, most of these cycles were not medically indicated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.